Home
Main Menu
Home
About
Search
Reviews >
... 2010
... 2009
... 2007
... 2006
... 2005
... 2004
... 2003
... 2002
... 2001
Industry
Psyreviews Comedy
Interviews
Contact
T-Shirts
Europe
Login Form
Login to post comments, vote, and generally tell psyreviews where he went wrong





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Download WAV's
Psyreviews-endorsed Digital Downloads Coming Soon
Share
Psyreviews RSS
Get the latest reviews and other shite from psyreviews.com via RSS





























 

 

 

 

 

 



 


 


 


 



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Digital Promo Servicing by EATDIGITAL

 

 Search Engine Optimisation by Bluestone

PDF Print E-mail
Written by damion psyreviews   
 
Average user rating    (0 vote)
Shulman


As you probably know, I’m not an artist. I don’t write music. Thank God, I hear you cry, and I also hear one or two of you raise the question of quite how anyone can pass criticism on a process (making music) when they have no experience of exactly how that process (making music) works, how it feels, or its affect on one’s soul.

 

I counter your intelligent and well-formed argument by saying that the role of the critic is to pass judgement on the product, not the process. Art can be defined as the process that leads up to the product, but the audience (of which the critic is part) can only form opinions on the product, and from this they can infer elements of the process.

 

This is a limitation of art criticism, but also of art itself. We can never bear witness to the artist’s individual state when embarking on, working on, or finishing a Work. The process is a fundamentally solo endeavour, while the product is a fundamentally universal one. Silence and noise. Black and white. It’s from this that the idea of the artist as a tortured, imprisoned genius probably comes.

 

In terms of Shulman’s new album, the fact that I am only able to review the product and not the process frustrates me.

 

The product, the album, is one thing but I am left with this suspicion that it’s the process that’s the really interesting part here. Which sort of leaves me unsure about what to say about this release.

 

I can say predictable, useless things about this release. I can say that the production is, of course, incredible. I can say that the use of live instrumentation adds colour and gravity. And I can say that the experimentation with world music styles is brave, even if it doesn’t work all the time.

 

I can also say that track 7 sounds like Sting’s Englishman In New York, that Transmissions In Bloom unfolds in the way that Shulman’s music does, or that Invention would get my vote as being the strongest track here.

 

The real interest is, I would guess, in what happened in the studio and in forming concepts of where this album was going to take them. Which unfortunately is something we will never know. It’s not an amazing record, nor is it a dreadful one. It’s certainly different, varied stuff with one foot (or at least a couple of toes) in Goa and one foot (or at least another couple of toes) in some Mediterranean beach bar. All in all, it’s endearing if somewhat baffling.


Users' Comments (0)

No comment posted

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.9 © 2007-2010 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev
Search psyreviews
Flex Your Mindpinion
Reviews. Still figurative in 2010?
 
Who's Online
We have 49 guests online
Popular Reviews
Popular Comedy
Global Timewasters
People who buy trance are idiots: fact.
Here is where they live
Visitor Map
Click image to view at non-migraine inducing size